Bearing in mind that I am only one witch and do not speak for all witches, here’s what I think.
On The Bible
I believe that the Bible is an interesting historical reference and a wonderful book of wisdom that can be applied in ways different than most Christians apply it. For instance, I don’t believe that the Father, the son and the holy ghost actually portray separate entities (and Christianity also teaches the paradox that they are the same being, depending upon the church you go to). Rather, I believe that those are our parts of self - id, ego, super ego - or fetch, talker, high self.
I also believe that there are quite a few reasons not to depend upon the Bible for day to day decisions:
- The books of Jasher (referred to in Joshua 10:13 as Book of the Upright (Sēper haiYāšār)) and Shemaiah. Never heard of those? That’s because text and whole books were removed from the ‘original’ translation of the Bible from the Vulgate. These texts are even referred to in the existing Bible.
Pope Damascus I was the pope who gathered the Council or Rome to decide which books were to be included in the Bible. Books that didn’t make the cut are now called apocrypha which are not ‘false’ books - but rather ‘hidden’ books. One group of (human) men decided what would be included in the Bible for all time. Hm. Aren’t I also human and able to decide what I think is worthy?
- The Bible quotes other classical literature of the time just like a spiritual author of our time might quote a scientific paper or another trusted source. I don’t know about you but that doesn’t sound like divine prophecy to me.
- The Bible that we in America have is NOT the ‘original (as ‘transmitted by god’)’. The Old Testament comes from the Jewish Tanakh, originally written in Hebrew and Aramaic. Early Christians used the Septuagint which was a translation of the Hebrew Bible which was then translated into the Vetus Latina in Latin. The New Testament, which many Christians refer to as the more applicable of the Testaments, was a result of the Church of England, translated in part from the Textus Receptus (by Erasmus from the Vulgate) and in part directly from the Vulgate.
However, text originally translated by Erasmus remains under criticism for the many typographical errors (that were only partially fixed later), the inconsistent source of translation between the first and last parts of Revelation and their limited scope of being translated from only six Greek variants originating as late as the 12th century despite the numerous variants world wide.
His text was later translated again by 47 different different scholars to be included, in part, in the New Testament. Did you know that there are over 4 ancient greek dialects? Who knows what the education level of these scholars are or what angle they took in learning these languages. Their instructions from King James was to write the new version to conform to the Church of England’s beliefs. It is this King James version which was eventually accepted by Protestants and Catholics alike as the ‘official’ English translation of the Bible.
Whew! That is a lot of translators with their hands in the pot! One known to have created a horribly shaky version, 47 who modified their assigned portion of the text to conform to King James’ wishes and 3 version that were translated by numerous people to and from numerous languages.
Have you ever tried to translate something from English into Spanish and there just weren’t the equivalent words to do so? So now imagine having over 55 different translators working in over five languages over hundreds of years and societal changes creating ONE single book that the entire world has adopted. Doesn’t seem like something I want to trust as ‘The Word of God’.
If you didn’t know any of that, why on EARTH would you live your ENTIRE life by it? Research, man!
Aside from all of that, I have a hard time believing that before Jesus was born, there were old men writing books that were from divine sources - but suddenly, no one is capable of talking directly to god and writing scriptures. The Bible just… stops.
According to Christianity, talking to God happens all the time. Speaking in tongues is the holy spirit, supposedly, right? So why would it not be possible for someone to be another prophet, writing books that are similar in content to, but different than the Bible and qualified to be included? And I know, I know.. the Bible has an answer for that. But referring to a definitive source rather than giving proof is a logical fallacy and I prefer to use the ability to apply logic that I evolved with.
On the Creation Story
I believe that the Creation story in the Bible is a myth just like the creation stories of other cultures. There are many parallels ie: A serpent wisdom bringer (the snake in the garden, lung dragon, Quetzalcoatl), the angels that were cast out (fallen angels, nephilim or watchers) but all in all, it is a myth that has no basis in the reality of evolution.
I grew up not knowing about the 15 billion years that preceded Adam and Eve. When school taught evolution, I was given a note from home saying I was not to participate and the school complied because this was fairly common. I was literally raised and educated as if the years before Adam and Eve never existed and I was nineteen before I learned otherwise.
These aren’t 15 billion years that didn’t exist. They are real, provable 15 billion years. It defies common sense to say they didn’t exist. It seems a sin (no pun intended) to raise a child truly believing that they should defy common sense and what’s right there in front of our faces in order to believe something with no factual basis other than a book which has dubious sources.
Here is a great story by Oberon Zell debunking the creation myth.
If the Christian story of creation is myth… then where does that put the rest of the Bible? And if it’s not a myth… well, the serpent never lied… Yahweh did. What does that say about Yahweh and the other things he tells man?
Jesus
I believe that Jesus was a real person that actually lived and taught. I believe that he was deified in much the same way as Buddha (Siddhattha Gotama) was. In fact, he was officially deified in the church by First Council of Nicaea. A group of human men declared him a deity. Could they not have made a mistake in the meaning of the texts that they used to make this declaration?
I believe that he was no more or no less than you or I or any of the other big spiritual teachers of our age. He just had a grasp on esoteric reasoning and said things about humans in general being ’sons of god’ that could be interpreted as he being the son of god. .
Organized Christianity
I believe, at it’s heart, Christianity is a generally good set of practices. I consider a ‘true Christian’ a person who follows the love and goodness meant by the core of Christianity and have a lot of respect for those folks.
However, organized Christianity is quite another thing, altogether. Organized Christianity discourages logical thought on the part of it’s followers, has a long history of being used to constrain it’s followers to the end of political agendas, seeks monetary support in shady ways and encourages hypocrisy, prejudice, substance abuse and other forms of avoidance by demonizing the reality of societal situations.
I guess, in summary, I think that there are valid and invalid points about Christianity. I don’t think it should be thrown out with the bath water but I think it’s ridiculous to follow the Bible or the organized form without question.
If in fact, you were created by a god that also gave you common sense and logical faculties, shouldn’t you use them? Why would it be considered sinful to think outside your religion with these faculties, punishable by an eternity in fire and brimstone?